A 2020 course by Jeffrey D. Meyers at Elmhurst College (now Elmhurst University) is “a critical introduction to normative Christian social ethics (its methodology, theology, and moral principles) on selected contemporary moral issues such as war, racism, hunger, poverty, and environmental degradation.”
A 2019 course by Jacob J. Erickson at Trinity College Dublin explores “contemporary theological and ethical perspectives on eating and drinking: from food systems to vegetarianism to scarcity and more. How might contemporary ethics shape and be shaped by what we eat or drink, how we eat or drink?”
A course by Stephen Shoemaker at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary introduces “students to the various notions of
gender, the body, and sexuality found in the earliest Christian traditions. The courseâs
main emphasis will be on the cultural construction of these three interrelated categories in
early Christian literature.”
A 2014 course by Charles Cosgrove at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary offers “an advanced course . . . on the interconnected topics of ethics and moral formation in
Paul. The course examines a wide range of material in Paulâs letters in the light of both Greco-
Roman sources and critical scholarship.”
A 2014 course by Hendrik Pieterse at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary introduces “students to the principal historical,
theological, and philosophical sources of Christian moral theology. . . . [and explores] the churchâs ethical witness in relation to questions such
as wealth and poverty, consumerism, church and politics, and moral and
religious diversity.”
A 2015 course by Malinda Elizabeth Berry at Anabaptist Mennonite Biblical Seminary explores “various perspectives on the meaning of justice, economic ‘development’ in the global village, economic systems and theories, economics and ecology, business ethics, economics in the church, and economic faithfulness for individual Christians.”
A course by Alfred Freddoso at the University of Notre Dame is designed ” to see in some depth the relation among the main elements of St. Thomas’s general moral theory as laid out in the First Part of the Second Part of the Summa Theologiae, viz., the treatises on beatitude, action, passion, habit, virtue, sin, law, and grace, and (b) to explore in more detail certain specific aspects of these treatises.” The distinctions between Aquinas’ moral theory and deontologism and consequentialism are also discussed.